lgo软件许可号许可码

tech2023-12-16 65

lgo软件许可号许可码

Selling software is a legal minefield. When you purchase a digital product, you’re not buying the CD/DVD and packaging, but a license to use the software. The license is a legally-binding agreement that determines how you may use that product. If software was “sold”, you would be the legal owner and could do what you wanted, e.g. install it anywhere, disassemble it, give it away or anything else that didn’t contravene copyright laws.

出售软件是合法的雷区。购买数字产品时，您不是在购买CD / DVD和包装，而是在购买使用该软件的许可。许可是具有法律约束力的协议，该协议确定您如何使用该产品。如果软件是“出售”的，则您将是合法所有者，并且可以做您想做的事，例如，将其安装在任何地方，拆卸它，赠予它或任何其他不违反版权法的行为。

However, what happens when you no longer need that product? Is it possible to re-sell your software license to another party in the same way that you can sell a second-hand book, music CD or movie DVD? It’s a legal grey area which has been highlighted by the case of Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.

但是，当您不再需要该产品时会发生什么？是否可以像出售二手书，音乐CD或电影DVD一样，将软件许可重新出售给另一方？这是法律灰色地带，在Vernor诉Autodesk，Inc.一案中得到了突出体现。

A SitePoint forum post by Dan Schulz describes the full legal arguments in detail. In summary, Vernor attempted to sell legal copies of AutoCAD on eBay but had his account suspended following intervention by Autodesk Inc. Vernor sued Autodesk in federal court:

丹·舒尔茨(Dan Schulz )在SitePoint论坛上发的帖子详细介绍了完整的法律论点。总之，Vernor试图在eBay上出售AutoCAD的合法副本，但在Autodesk Inc.的干预下，其帐户被暂停。Vernor在联邦法院起诉Autodesk：

Vernor claimed he purchased the license from vendors who must have been the legal owners of the software. Therefore, the ownership transferred to him on purchase.

Vernor声称他从必须是该软件的合法所有者的供应商那里购买了许可证。因此，所有权在购买时转移给了他。 Autodesk contended that ownership was never transferred, Vernor’s sale infringed copyright, cited that its license was a “computer software agreement”, and the industry normally restricted ownership transfers.

Autodesk辩称所有权从未转让，Vernor的销售侵犯了版权，并称其许可是“计算机软件协议”，并且该行业通常限制所有权转让。

The court disagreed with Autodesk and felt it had “little competent evidence of software industry practice” presented before it. The ruling therefore allows the licensed party to transfer software ownership and the copyright owner has no say in the matter. Software companies are selling a product that an end-user owns; if they receive the full value up-front, they cannot control that software once it’s in the stream of commerce.

Autodesk may yet appeal, but at least a dozen copies of AutoCAD are currently available on eBay.com.

Autodesk可能仍然有吸引力，但是eBay.com上目前至少有十几个AutoCAD副本。

Could the ruling be good news for web developers? End users rarely purchase web applications or “own” the software — they subscribe to a service. Many software companies will be re-considering their software distribution options.

这项裁决对网络开发人员来说是个好消息吗？最终用户很少购买Web应用程序或“拥有”软件-他们订阅了服务。许多软件公司将重新考虑其软件分发选项。

翻译自: https://www.sitepoint.com/is-software-licensed-or-sold/

lgo软件许可号许可码